List of Partners vendors. Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Business Business Essentials. Business Essentials Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions. Key Takeaways Human resources HR is the division of a business that is charged with finding, screening, recruiting, and training job applicants, and administering employee-benefit programs.
Additional human resources responsibilities include compensation and benefits, recruitment, firing, and keeping up to date with any laws that may affect the company and its employees. Many companies have moved away from traditional in-house human resources HR administrative duties and outsourced tasks like payroll and benefits to outside vendors. Article Sources. Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts.
We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy. Compare Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear.
Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace. Wellness programs aim to improve employee health through exercise, weight loss, and preventive education.
Some offer cash or gift card incentives. Why Companies Use Outsourcing Outsourcing is a practice used by different companies to reduce costs by transferring portions of work to outside suppliers rather than completing it internally. Why Hard Skills Matter Hard skills are learned abilities that you acquire through practice and education.
Learn about examples of hard skills to include on your resume. The most popular online Visio alternative , Lucidchart is utilized in over countries by millions of users, from sales managers mapping out target organizations to IT directors visualizing their network infrastructure.
So what does HR do? What is an HR department? What does human resources do? Here are some of the tasks your HR department is busy completing every day. Learn how. Hire the right employees Human resources is in charge of arranging interviews, coordinating hiring efforts, and onboarding new employees. Process payroll Payroll is its own beast. Conduct disciplinary actions This responsibility may be why HR tends to get a bad rap. Read more. Update policies Policies need to be updated or at least examined every year as the organization changes.
Maintain employee records Maintaining HR records is mandated by law. Conduct benefit analysis Staying competitive is of prime importance when trying to attract the best talent. How does HR support employees? Here are four ways HR helps support the emotional and career needs of employees: 1. Offering continuing education Sometimes the career growth mentioned above requires additional training. Considering these responsibilities, employees should feel comfortable reaching out to their HR departments in these, and similar, situations: When you or a co-worker experience harassment or discrimination from your colleagues, including your manager When you have questions about benefits, including company-provided health insurance, or rights guaranteed by law When your personal circumstances change e.
Read the article. Start diagramming with Lucidchart today—try it for free! Sign up free. The scarcity of general managers who are as capable, confident, and experienced in the management of large numbers of people as they are in production, marketing, finance, and control is a further problem in many companies. Nonetheless, despite their inexperience, executives who reach the top must select and integrate the six different concepts and disciplines of human relations, personnel administration, and industrial engineering.
They must also manage the conflicts among the interests of the corporation as a whole, the different divisions, and the separate plants and facilities.
Why do so many general managers usually lack these skills? Several factors contribute to the difficulty. The first is that personnel work has seldom been attractive to fast-moving, younger general managers, who see the field as out of the mainstream of the business.
Also, they see personnel as a staff function that is strictly advisory, that lacks authority and power, and that deals with small-scale, troublesome problems. A personnel job is seldom an attractive position for a manager who wants to run something independently. Because they involve many other managers, they are not only time-consuming but also often frustrating.
For these reasons, few outstanding managers move into personnel, and those in it often have problems getting out. The detail, the time required to gain expertise, the low status in the organization, and the lack of clear-cut authority can swallow up and overwhelm all but the very best in the field.
Finally, a few commonly held assumptions, the validity of which is increasingly doubtful, are at the root of the HRM problem. If one believes that well-intentioned managers naturally do well at HRM, the following will also seem valid:.
Responsible, generous, enlightened top management will develop an effective employee group because its considerate and humane practices will inevitably trickle down and permeate the organization. Management may share its prerogative to manage if it wishes, but philosophically employees have no right to manage.
These premises are no longer valid. Widespread dissatisfaction with jobs despite adequate pay has been documented. More workers now see good jobs as rights. It makes available services and advice that line managers can accept or reject since they have the responsibility for line operations.
Decisions affecting human resource quality should not be dealt with in a secondary, catch-up, tidy-up, reactive way. Doing so gives a lower priority to personnel activities than to production, sales, or finance; results in personnel management assignments being a sentence to oblivion; fosters second-rate, sloppy personnel activities; and removes accountability from personnel officers for setting up reactive, short-term HRM policies.
By establishing careful and detailed annual forecasts and budgets and monitoring results by month, quarter, and year to meet the plans adopted, managers can effectively control and operate companies. This premise drives out long-range thinking as well as the long lead times required to build effective human resources.
When good managers who will be held accountable are armed with good solutions, substantial improvements will result. Managers wishing superior human resources must get at fundamental rather than superficial symptoms; they need to accept disappointments and unexpected outcomes of solutions to complex problems, and they need the staying power to work persistently at improving the quality of human resources. These problems are massive and stubborn.
Since changing habits, skills, values, beliefs, and attitudes in a work force takes years, the lack of long-range planning in human resources is frequently disastrous. So the ultimate irony is that the personnel function—which deals with the most fundamental and central corporate competitive resource and that has the longest time horizon of any function—is left with no long-range strategy and allowed to react merely to transient pressures and events.
To develop human resources, corporate management will have to make some fundamental changes in its conventional wisdom. Managers need to tackle the mistaken premises head on and cast them out in favor of a new set like the following: If managers continually fail to listen, communicate, explain, anticipate, and in every way nurture commitment and mutual understanding, employees will inevitably become alienated.
In the nature of people and organizations there is a relentless gravitational slide toward alienation. Any company can begin to improve the management of human resources simply by doing the basics better. The most practical way to start is by performing all the routine ongoing personnel activities with extraordinary care. Research suggests that for the many reasons cited earlier, recruiting, selection, compensation, job design, training, and communications procedures are in many companies hastily and inadequately carried out.
Worst of all is supervision—the oldest and most written about of management skills. The business schools neglect it, and economics, schedules, costs, and time pressures allow careless and inhumane practices to characterize it.
Poor supervision is absolutely unnecessary—yet millions of workers have to put up with it. It hurts American manufacturing and service industries beyond belief. The importance of good supervision is so obvious that its rarity is astounding. The enormous improvements in HRM at General Motors began when managers went back to the basics of good supervision and communication. For instance, although QWL programs were behind the turnaround at Tarrytown, the fundamental changes were achieved by supervisors simply treating people with care and respect.
Managers need to set a seven-year time horizon for their human resources planning and operation. It takes at least seven years for managers to install, live with, improve, and reap the benefits of major change in personnel activities; to weed out unproductive skills or attitudes; and to hire a new generation. And it takes that long for employees to live through a period of history in a company that forms a new foundation of trust. Seen as a seven-year ongoing problem, the task of human resources management takes on a whole new cast demanding staying power as well as clear philosophy and strategy.
Similarly, at Hewlett-Packard the founders enunciated a set of standards that placed people first. To this day, these values persist with great benefit to these companies. Having a seven-year horizon requires that managers develop a philosophy, some objectives, and a strategy.
Since human resources strategic planning is as yet a largely unknown art and since it may take researchers years to develop competence, managers would do better to begin on their own rather than wait for the perfect approach.
But how to begin? The combined experiences of four major U. Experience in HRM strategic planning shows that the process nearly always raises a fundamental problem: the divisions or departments of the company have different competitive strategies and often need different performance from their people.
Similarly, within a division or a location, groups may need different personnel policies and activities. But can a company, for example, pay people differently in engineering than it can in purchasing or accounting? The answer is yes, but only when management discards the old uniformity rules and designs personnel policies to achieve strategically essential objectives.
Companies wishing to improve their HRM need to establish a long-term program to develop general managers with human resources management skills and experience. Considering the personnel department as a functional operation with strong authority and responsibility for effective human resources management practices has helped several companies to attract and keep good personnel managers.
By regarding the development of superior human resources as an essential competitive requirement that needs long-range, functional strategic plans, top managers can attract many of the best managers in the company to the HRM function.
Some companies that have moved outstanding managers into personnel functions for two- to four-year periods have, after five to seven years, developed a top management group, a high proportion of which has had in-depth experience in the formulation and implementation of human resources strategy. But during the last decade variations among persons available for employment appear to have greatly increased.
Subtle differences in job and personal skills and in attitudes toward work and employers have made selecting an outstanding set of employees even more difficult.
0コメント